Section 9 Procedures for testing tanks and tight boundaries

9.1.1 The test procedures detailed in this Section are to be used to confirm the watertightness of tanks and watertight boundaries, the structural adequacy of tanks and weathertightness of structures.

9.2 Application

9.2.1 The testing requirements for gravity tanks, defined as tanks subject to a vapour pressure not greater than 70 kN/m 2 , and other boundaries required to be watertight or weathertight, are to be tested in accordance with this Section. Tests are to be carried out in the presence of a Surveyor at a stage sufficiently close to completion such that the strength and tightness are not subsequently impaired and prior to any sealing and cement work being applied over joints see also Pt 3, Ch 1, 9.8 Application of coating.

1. the shipyard provides documentary evidence of the Shipowner�s agreement to a request to the responsible Flag Administration for an exemption from the application of Regulation 11 - Initial testing of watertight bulkheads, etc. or for an equivalency agreeing that the content of Pt 3, Ch 1, 9.5 Structural test procedures for non-SOLAS ships and SOLAS exempt/equivalent ships is equivalent to Regulation 11 - Initial testing of watertight bulkheads, etc. and;
2. the above-mentioned exemption/equivalency has been granted by the responsible Flag Administration.

9.2.3 Where the requirements of Pt 3, Ch 1, 9.2 Application 9.2.2.(a) and Pt 3, Ch 1, 9.2 Application 9.2.2.(b) have been met, then the testing procedures for watertight compartments for SOLAS Ships (including CSR BC & OT) are to be carried out in accordance with Pt 3, Ch 1, 9.5 Structural test procedures for non-SOLAS ships and SOLAS exempt/equivalent ships

9.2.4 Testing procedures for watertight compartments for non-SOLAS Ships are to be carried out in accordance with Pt 3, Ch 1, 9.5 Structural test procedures for non-SOLAS ships and SOLAS exempt/equivalent ships.

9.2.5 The testing of cargo containment systems of liquefied gas carriers are to be in accordance with the requirements of Ch 4 of the Rules and Regulations for the Classification of Ships for the Carriage of Liquefied Gases in Bulk.

9.2.6 The testing of structures not listed in this Section are to be specially considered.

Table 1.9.1 Testing requirements

Note 1. Including tanks arranged in accordance with the provisions of SOLAS Regulation 9 - Double bottoms in passenger ships and cargo ships other than tankers.

Note 2. Top of tank is the deck forming the top of the tank, excluding any hatchways. In holds for liquid cargo or ballast with large hatch openings, the top of tank is to be taken to the top of the hatch.

Note 3. Including dry compartments and duct keels arranged in accordance with the provisions of SOLAS Chapter II-1 Regulation 9 - Double bottoms in passenger ships and cargo ships other than tankers and Regulation 11 - Initial testing of watertight bulkheads, etc., as well as voids used for the protection of fuel oil tanks and pump rooms arranged in accordance with the provisions of MARPOL Annex I, Reg. 12A and Reg. 22.

Note 4. Testing of the aft peak is to be carried out after the sterntube has been fitted.

Note 6. Watertight doors and hatches not confirmed watertight by a prototype test are to be subject to a hydrostatic test, see SOLAS Chapter II-1 Regulation 16 - Construction and initial tests of watertight closures

Note 7. For shell doors providing watertight closure, watertightness is to be demonstrated through prototype testing before installation. The testing procedure is to be agreed with LR prior to testing.

Note 8. Where a cargo tank is designed for the carriage of cargoes with a specific gravity greater than 1,0, an appropriate additional head is to be considered.

Note 9. Where air vents are fitted below the top of the coaming, adequate blanking off of these vents may be required prior to the commencement of the test.

Note 10. Other testing methods listed in Pt 3, Ch 1, 9.7 Definitions and details of tests 9.7.7 and Pt 3, Ch 1, 9.7 Definitions and details of tests 9.7.8 may be considered, subject to adequacy of such testing methods being verified, see SOLAS Chapter II-1 Regulation 11 - Initial testing of watertight bulkheads, etc..

Note 11. Where L.O. sump tanks and other similar spaces under main engines intended to hold liquid form part of the watertight subdivision of the ship, they are to be tested in accordance with the requirements for deep tanks (other than those listed elsewhere).

Note 12. All watertight doors and hatches are to be hose tested after installation. Hose testing is to be carried out from each side of a door or hatch unless, for a specific application, flooding is anticipated from only one side. Where a hose test is not practicable because of possible damage to machinery, electrical equipment insulation or outfitting items, it may be replaced by an ultrasonic leak test or an equivalent test.

Note 13. Independent tanks not confirmed watertight by a prototype test are to be subject to a hydrostatic test. A leak test is to be carried out after installation on board.

9.3 Test types

9.3.1 The types of test specified in this Section are:

1. Structural test: which is to be conducted to verify the tightness and structural adequacy of the construction of tanks. This may be a hydrostatic test or, where the situation warrants, a hydropneumatic test.
2. Leak test: which is to be used to verify the tightness of a boundary. Unless a specific test is indicated, this may be a hydrostatic, hydropneumatic test, air or other medium test.

9.4 Structural test procedures for SOLAS ships

9.4.1 Tanks which are intended to hold liquids, and which form part of the watertight subdivision of the ship, shall be tested for tightness and structural strength as indicated in Table 1.9.1 Testing requirements.

9.4.2 Watertight subdivision means the transverse and longitudinal subdivisions of the ship required to satisfy the subdivision requirements of SOLAS - International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea Chapter II-1 - Construction - Structure, subdivision and stability, machinery and electrical installations.

9.4.3 Where a structural test is specified in Table 1.9.1 Testing requirements, unless specified otherwise, a hydrostatic test is to be carried out in accordance with Pt 3, Ch 1, 9.7 Definitions and details of tests 9.7.1. Where practical limitations prevent a hydrostatic test being carried out, a hydropneumatic test in accordance with Pt 3, Ch 1, 9.7 Definitions and details of tests 9.7.2 is to be conducted. All external boundaries of the tested space are to be examined for structural distortion, bulging, buckling, or other related damage and/or leaks.

9.4.4 A hydrostatic test or hydropneumatic test may be carried out afloat to confirm the structural adequacy of tanks, provided that a leak test is carried out and the results are confirmed as satisfactory before the vessel is afloat.

9.4.5 Consideration is to be given to the selection of tanks to be structurally tested. Selected tanks are to be chosen so that all representative structural members are tested for the expected tension and compression. Tank boundaries are to be tested from at least one side.

9.4.6 For watertight boundaries of spaces other than tanks, excluding ballast holds, chain lockers and cargo holds which are intended to be used for in-port ballasting, structural testing may be exempted completely, provided that the watertightness in all boundaries of exempted spaces are verified by leak tests and thorough inspection. The testing of ballast holds, chain lockers and cargo holds which are intended to be used for in-port ballasting, are to comply with the requirements of Pt 3, Ch 1, 9.4 Structural test procedures for SOLAS ships 9.4.3 to Pt 3, Ch 1, 9.4 Structural test procedures for SOLAS ships 9.4.5.

9.4.7 Tanks which do not form part of the watertight subdivision of the ship, need not be structurally tested providing that the watertightness of all boundaries of these spaces is verified by leak tests and thorough inspection.

9.5 Structural test procedures for non-SOLAS ships and SOLAS exempt/equivalent ships

9.5.2 For tanks of the same structural design, configuration and the same general workmanship, as determined by the attending Surveyor, a structural test need only be carried out on one tank, provided that all subsequent tanks are tested for leaks by an air test. The relaxation to accept leak testing using an air test instead of a structural test does not apply to cargo space boundaries adjacent to other compartments in tankers and combination carriers or to the boundaries of tanks for segregated cargoes or pollutant cargoes in other types of ship.

9.5.3 Where the structural adequacy of a tank has been verified by structural testing on a previous vessel in a series, tanks of structural similarity on subsequent vessels within that series (which are built at the same shipyard) need not be structurally tested, provided that the watertightness of all exempt tanks is verified by leak tests and thorough inspection. However, structural testing is to be carried out for at least one tank of each type of tank on every vessel in the series. The relaxation to accept leak testing and thorough inspections instead of a structural test on subsequent vessels in a series does not apply to cargo space boundaries adjacent to other compartments in tankers and combination carriers or to the boundaries of tanks for segregated cargoes or pollutant cargoes in other types of ship.

9.5.4 For sister ships built two or more years after the delivery of the last ship of the series, the application of the provisions of Pt 3, Ch 1, 9.5 Structural test procedures for non-SOLAS ships and SOLAS exempt/equivalent ships 9.5.3 will be specially considered provided that the general practices, equipment and workmanship of the shipyard have been maintained continuously, and an NDT programme is implemented for the tanks not subject to structural tests.

9.6 Leak test procedures

9.6.1 Where a leak test is specified in Table 1.9.1 Testing requirements, unless specified otherwise, a tank air test, compressed air fillet weld test, or vacuum box test is to be carried out in accordance with the applicable requirements of Pt 3, Ch 1, 9.7 Definitions and details of tests 9.7.4 to Pt 3, Ch 1, 9.7 Definitions and details of tests 9.7.6. A hydrostatic or hydropneumatic test conducted in accordance with the applicable requirements of Pt 3, Ch 1, 9.7 Definitions and details of tests 9.7.1 and Pt 3, Ch 1, 9.7 Definitions and details of tests 9.7.2 will be accepted as a leak test on the condition that safe access to all joints being examined is provided, see Pt 3, Ch 1, 9.9 Safe access to joints 9.9.1. Where a hydrostatic or hydropneumatic test is applied as a leak test, the external boundaries are to be free of any liquid residue prior to the commencement of the test.

9.6.2 A hose test will be accepted as means of verifying the tightness of joints only in specific locations, identified in Table 1.9.1 Testing requirements.

9.6.3 Air tests of joints may be conducted at any stage during construction provided that all work that might affect the tightness of the joint is completed before the test is carried out.

9.6.4 Where acceptable to the attending Surveyor, provided that careful visual inspections show a continuous uniform weld profile shape, free from repairs, and the results of selected NDE testing show no significant defects, the leak testing of automatic butt welds and semi-automatic (flux core arc welding) butt welds may be omitted.

9.7 Definitions and details of tests

9.7.1 Hydrostatic test is a test conducted by filling a space with a liquid to a specified head. Unless another liquid is approved, the hydrostatic test is to consist of filling a space with either fresh or sea-water, whichever is appropriate for the space being tested, to the level specified in Table 1.9.1 Testing requirements. For tanks intended to carry cargoes of a higher density than the test liquid, the head of the liquid is to be specially considered.

9.7.2 Hydropneumatic test is a combination of a hydrostatic test and a tank air test, consisting of partially filling a tank with water and conducting a tank air test on the unfilled portion of the tank. A hydropneumatic test, where approved, is to be such that the test condition in conjunction with the approved liquid level and air pressure will simulate the actual loading as far as practicable. The requirements for tank air testing shown in Pt 3, Ch 1, 9.7 Definitions and details of tests 9.7.4 are to be adhered to.

9.7.3 Hose test is a test used to verify the tightness of joints with a jet of water. The jet of water is to be directed perpendicular to the joint. It is to be carried out with the pressure in the hose nozzle maintained at not less than 0,2 MPa during the test. The hose nozzle is to have a minimum inside diameter of 12 mm and is to be situated no further than 1,5 m from the joint. Where a hose test is not practical because of possible damage to machinery, electrical equipment insulation or outfitting items, it may be replaced by a careful visual examination of welded connections, supported by an ultrasonic or penetration leak test, or an equivalent, see SOLAS Regulation 11 - Initial testing of watertight bulkheads, etc.

9.7.4 Tank air test is to be used to verify the tightness of a compartment by means of an air pressure differential and leak indicator solution. An efficient indicating solution (e.g. soapy water) is to be applied to the weld or penetration being tested and is to be examined whilst an air pressure differential of not less than 0,015 MPa is applied by pumping air into the compartment. Arrangements are to be made to ensure that any increase in air pressure does not exceed 0,03 MPa. A U-tube with a height sufficient to hold a head of water corresponding to the required test pressure is to be used for verification and to avoid overpressure. The cross-sectional area of the U-tube is not to be less than that of the pipe supplying air to the tank. Alternatively, two calibrated pressure gauges may be considered acceptable. All boundary welds, including pipe connections in the compartment are to be examined twice. The first is to be examined immediately upon applying the leak indication solution; the second approximately five minutes afterwards.

9.7.5 Compressed air fillet weld test. This test consists of compressed air being injected into one end of a fillet welded joint and the pressure verified at the other end of the joint by a pressure gauge. Pressure gauges are to be arranged so that an air pressure of at least 0,015 MPa above atmospheric pressure can be verified at each end of all passages within the portion being tested. A leak indicator solution is to be applied and the weld line examined for leaks. A compressed air test may be carried out for partial penetration welds where the root face is greater than 6 mm.

9.7.6 Vacuum box test is a test used to verify the tightness of joints by means of a localised air pressure differential and leak indicator solution. The test is to be conducted with the use of a box with air connections, gauges and an inspection window that is to be placed over the joint being tested with a leak indicator solution applied. The air within the box is to be removed by an ejector to create a vacuum i.e. a pressure differential of 0,02 to 0,026 MPa inside the box.

9.7.7 Ultrasonic test may be used where a hose test is not practical to verify the tightness of a boundary, see Pt 3, Ch 1, 9.7 Definitions and details of tests 9.7.3. An arrangement of ultrasonic echo transmitters is to be placed inside a compartment and a receiver outside. The receiver is to be used to detect any leaks in the compartment.

9.7.8 Penetration test may be used where a hose test is not practical to assess butt welds, see Pt 3, Ch 1, 9.7 Definitions and details of tests 9.7.3, by applying a low surface tension liquid to one side of a compartment boundary. When no liquid is detected on the opposite side of the boundary after expiration of a defined period of time, the verification of tightness of the compartment�s boundary may be assumed. A developer solution may be applied on the other side of the weld to aid leak detection.

9.7.9 Other methods of testing may be considered and are to be agreed by LR prior to commencement of testing.

9.8 Application of coating

9.8.1 A final coating may be applied over automatic butt welds before the completion of a leak test, provided that careful visual inspections show continuous uniform weld profile shape, free from repairs, and the results of selected NDE testing show no significant defects. For all other joints, the final coating is to be applied after the completion of a leak test. The Surveyor reserves the right to require a leak test prior to the application of the final coating over automatic erection butt welds.

9.8.2 Any temporary coating which may conceal defects or leaks is to be applied at a time as specified for the final coating, see Pt 3, Ch 1, 9.8 Application of coating 9.8.1. This requirement does not apply to shop primer.

9.9 Safe access to joints

9.9.1 For leak tests, safe access to all joints under examination is to be provided.